
Which transit improvement should our neighborhood fund first?
What do you think?
Early responses favor safer stops. The room has met its 15-person cohort threshold, while demographic breakdowns remain limited to groups large enough to report safely.
Where responses overlap
✓ The first project should improve safety as well as service.
What remains unresolved
◇ Whether frequency or geographic coverage produces the larger near-term benefit.
Public-topic bridge
The public discussion remains visible here to keep the private room connected to arguments outside its membership.
Read the public discussion · 128 participantsStandout responses across all positions
Select a position above to compare its most endorsed, persuasive, liked, and active responses.
Bus frequency
Shorter waits on existing routes.
Shorter waits on existing routes. This opening argument identifies the strongest practical benefit while inviting participants to add evidence, exceptions, and implementation detail.
Safer stops
Lighting, shelters, and crossings.
Lighting, shelters, and crossings. This opening argument identifies the strongest practical benefit while inviting participants to add evidence, exceptions, and implementation detail.
New coverage
Serve currently disconnected blocks.
Serve currently disconnected blocks. This opening argument identifies the strongest practical benefit while inviting participants to add evidence, exceptions, and implementation detail.
Recommended topics

Housing near major transit stops should allow substantially greater density.

Should large employers adopt a four-day workweek without reducing pay?
