How should our district permit students to use generative AI?
What do you think?
Participants largely agree that undisclosed submission is unacceptable, but differ on whether guided use should begin now or after staff training and assessment standards are in place.
Where responses overlap
✓ Undisclosed submission should not be treated as original student work.
What remains unresolved
◇ Whether guided classroom use should begin before staff-wide training.
What the public discussion is saying
The linked public debate emphasizes transparent disclosure, narrow definitions, and the risk of treating all AI assistance as equally deceptive.
Read the public discussion · 128 participantsStandout responses across all positions
Select a position above to compare its most endorsed, persuasive, liked, and active responses.
Teach and permit
Allow disclosed use with instruction.
Allow disclosed use with instruction. This opening argument identifies the strongest practical benefit while inviting participants to add evidence, exceptions, and implementation detail.
Limited pilots
Permit defined uses in selected courses.
Permit defined uses in selected courses. This opening argument identifies the strongest practical benefit while inviting participants to add evidence, exceptions, and implementation detail.
Restrict for now
Pause student use while policy develops.
Pause student use while policy develops. This opening argument identifies the strongest practical benefit while inviting participants to add evidence, exceptions, and implementation detail.
Recommended topics
Should AI-generated political content require a visible disclosure label?
Housing near major transit stops should allow substantially greater density.