OneStone
TopicspublicassertionArtists should have more control over resale prices for concert tickets
A phone displaying a concert ticket is held above a vibrant live-music crowd.

Artists should have more control over resale prices for concert tickets.

7 participants4 written responses2 response optionsUpdated 13 days ago
Choices

What do you think?

Audience overview
Balanced briefAI-assisted · reviewed against leading responses

Responses emphasize that the stated goal is broadly shared while disagreeing about cost, scope, accountability, and whether a uniform rule or locally adaptable approach would work better.

Statistics are still private.3 more opted-in participants are needed before demographic or location summaries appear.
Aggregates only · minimum n=10
Common ground

Where responses overlap

The policy should be evaluated against concrete outcomes and unintended consequences.

Key disagreements

What remains unresolved

Whether a broad rule or a narrower, adaptable approach is more likely to work.

Responses

Response highlights

Standout responses across all positions

Select a position above to compare its most endorsed, persuasive, liked, and active responses.

Most endorsedCamila OwensAgree · 1 endorsements
Most persuasiveDarius BrooksDisagree · 87 persuasion · 0 shifts
Most likedSofia MartinezAgree · 5 likes
Most activeJules DasDisagree · 4 replies · 5 levels deep

Agree

The assertion is substantially correct.

2
Most persuasive Most liked
SM
Sofia MartinezLocal government perspectiveThis week
96

The strongest case for this option is practical: it sets a clear goal while leaving room to measure whether the policy actually works. The assertion is substantially correct.

82 persuasion0 view shifts0 endorsements from other positions
Most endorsed Most active
CO
Camila OwensHealthcare perspectiveToday
88

The alternative deserves more weight because it can be reversed if the evidence changes and does not require every community to make the same choice. The assertion is substantially correct.

What could change this viewReliable outcome data showing that a different approach works better without shifting the burden elsewhere.
72 persuasion0 view shifts0 endorsements from other positions
JD
Jules DasCommunity organizing perspectiveToday
74

This changes part of my view. A narrower pilot with a public evaluation would address the risk I was most concerned about.

88 persuasion1 view shifts0 endorsements from other positions
HJ
Hana JohnsonDesign perspectiveThis week
84

That distinction helps, but I would want the review to measure outcomes rather than only whether the process was followed.

73 persuasion0 view shifts2 endorsements from other positions

Disagree

The assertion is substantially incorrect.

2
Most endorsed Most liked Most active
JD
Jules DasCommunity organizing perspectiveToday
92

Fairness here is not only about equal treatment; it is also about whether people facing different barriers can realistically use the policy. The assertion is substantially incorrect.

77 persuasion0 view shifts0 endorsements from other positions
VG
Valerie GrantEngineering perspectiveToday
79

The premise makes sense, though the comparison needs a baseline so ordinary year-to-year variation is not mistaken for an effect.

66 persuasion0 view shifts1 endorsements from other positions
Most persuasive
DB
Darius BrooksParent perspectiveThis week
75

A useful decision should begin with the people most affected, then compare administrative cost with the likely public benefit. The assertion is substantially incorrect.

87 persuasion0 view shifts0 endorsements from other positions